Re: [smartpowerdir] IETF Internet Protocol Standards for Smart Grid

RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 07 June 2011 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smartpowerdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpowerdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468C911E8198 for <smartpowerdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3RMva8sUNRa for <smartpowerdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FC311E818F for <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 9EF0C98C4FA; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:17:57 -0700
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20110607161757.GB21869@rfc-editor.org>
References: <032801cc2512$04474380$0cd5ca80$@com> <E7B4B697-0FE1-44DE-A45F-2F833FEDBE80@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E7B4B697-0FE1-44DE-A45F-2F833FEDBE80@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: Mark Klerer <mklerer@qualcomm.com>, Stuart McCafferty <stuart@enernex.com>, "Widergren, Steve E" <Steve.Widergren@pnnl.gov>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Marty Burns <burnsmarty@aol.com>, "David H. Su" <david.su@nist.gov>, Dave Mollerstuen <dmollerstuen@tendrilinc.com>, IETF SmartPower Directorate <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [smartpowerdir] IETF Internet Protocol Standards for Smart Grid
X-BeenThere: smartpowerdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Members of the Smart Power Directorate <smartpowerdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpowerdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:17:58 -0000

Hi Fred,

Apologies for the delay.  We expect the document to be in AUTH48 by
by the end of the week (by Monday at the latest).  The document will
be available by RFC number from the AUTH48 directory at that time.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Sandy

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:24:12AM -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
> Ladies:
> 
> I am in receipt of a query from NIST's contractr for the Smart Grid regarding http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-ietf-core. Can you comment on it please?
> 
> Fred
> 
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Marty Burns wrote:
> 
> > Fred,
> >  
> > We received a comment from Microsoft today about placing our Internet RFC on the Catalog of Standards before it receives an RFC number from the IETF.
> >  
> > ?The IETF Internet Protocol Standards for Smart Grid should not be voted on until its been published as an RFC? from John Calhoon ? Microsoft
> >  
> > I think there is merit to this position and it seems reasonable to me to hold off on the vote until the number is assigned and the document can be retrieved by it. I think we expected this to occur already and this is why we scheduled a vote. However, it does seem questionable to vote on a document that cannot be formally identified.
> >  
> > Do you think this number will come in the next few days (we need to start the vote on June 14th)? Alternatively we can have this vote as soon as the number is assigned or with the very next batch of standards.
> >  
> > What are your thoughts?
> >  
> > Cheers,
> > Marty
> >