Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 22 December 2010 21:21 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008DD3A6B84 for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:21:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT8M3Hs--4QC for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619203A6B83 for <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAIv6EU2rR7H+/2dsb2JhbACkIXOoD5s/gwSCRQSEZoUqdIMd
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,215,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="236733143"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 21:23:21 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBMLNFqK014519; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:23:20 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:23:20 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com on Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:23:20 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <77850D9C-3546-4A51-9842-CD19DB009D68@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:23:05 -0800
Message-Id: <5040077C-84A7-4A2F-83FB-575D360A13FB@cisco.com>
References: <4D121745.5030109@piuha.net> <1293034070.2211.25.camel@d430> <77850D9C-3546-4A51-9842-CD19DB009D68@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IETF SmartPower Directorate <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT
X-BeenThere: smartpowerdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Members of the Smart Power Directorate <smartpowerdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpowerdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:21:26 -0000
I'll suggest making sure Lixia can attend. She has some relevant ideas. On Dec 22, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > the suggestion was to have the workshop on Friday and tutorials on Saturday. > > Recently, we organized a privacy workshop in Boston and it was not attached to any other event. Hence, everyone had to travel without any ability to optimize. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote: > >> Jari, >> Is there any way to make this workshop on Saturday? Putting it on >> Friday means that we have to leave the US at the latest by Thursday and >> in reality on Wednesday. Personally this makes it very unlikely that I >> will be able to attend. >> >> Not sure about all the others traveling from the US. >> >> geoff >> >> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:20 +0200, Jari Arkko wrote: >>> Hannes, me, Zack, and a few others have been talking about organizing a >>> workshop right before the next IETF on IOT. Thoughts? Good idea/bad >>> idea? Sufficient participation can be drummed up? >>> >>> ---- >>> >>> Internet Scale Machine-to-Machine Networking >>> >>> Background >>> >>> Today's Internet is experienced by users as a set of applications, >>> such as email, instant messaging, and social networks. While these >>> applications do not require users to be present at the time of service >>> execution in many cases they are. There are also substantial >>> differences in performance between the various end devices, but in >>> general end devices participating in the Internet are considered to be >>> of higher performance. >>> >>> As we move forward with the interconnection of all kinds of devices to >>> the Internet, these characteristics will change. "Internet of Things" >>> is a vision where a large number of devices benefit from the >>> communication services offered by the Internet. Many of these devices >>> are not directly operated by humans, but exist as stand-alone >>> components in buildings, vehicles, and the environment. There will be >>> a lot of variation in the computing power, available memory, and >>> communications bandwidth between different types of devices. >>> >>> Many of these devices provide new services or provide more value for >>> our previously unconnected devices. Some devices have been connected >>> in various legacy means in the past but are now migrating to the use >>> of the Internet Protocol, sharing the same communications medium >>> between all applications and enabling rich communications services. >>> >>> Much of this development can simply run on existing Internet >>> protocols. For instance, home entertainment and monitoring systems >>> often offer a web interface to the end user. In many cases the new, >>> constrained environments can benefit from additional protocols that >>> help optimize the communications and lower the computational >>> requirements. Examples of standardization efforts targeted for these >>> environments include the "Constrained RESTful Environments (core)", >>> IPv6 over Low power WPAN (6lowpan)", Routing Over Low power and Lossy >>> networks (roll)" working groups. >>> >>> This workshop aims to explore the experience and approaches taken by >>> developers of Internet technology, when considering the >>> characteristics of constraint devices. Engineers know that many design >>> considerations need to be taken into account when developing protocols >>> and architecture. Balancing between the conflicting goals of computing >>> performance, code size, economical incentives, and security is often >>> difficult, as illustrated by Clark, et al. in "Tussle in Cyberspace: >>> Defining Tomorrow's Internet", see >>> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/PubPDFs/Tussle2002.pdf >>> >>> This workshop aims to discuss the experience and approaches taken when >>> designing Internet of Things into protocols and architectures. To >>> frame the discussion we suggest, as examples, to investigate the area >>> of integration in the following categories: >>> >>> * scalability >>> * power usage >>> * interworking between different technologies and network domains >>> * usability and manageability >>> * security >>> >>> "To make the Internet work better" is the goal of the IETF and the >>> workshop organizers are interested in receiving contributions and in >>> having discussions that support this goal. Results may lead to >>> guidelines and recommendations, the development of standards, further >>> need for research, or implementation and configuration best current >>> practices. >>> >>> Workshop Style >>> >>> The workshop’s main focus will be on the discussions. In order to keep >>> the group at a manageable size, participants are required to submit a >>> position paper as an expression of interest. Submitters of accepted >>> position papers will be invited to attend the workshop. Active >>> participation will be expected. >>> >>> The workshop will be structured as a series of working sessions >>> punctuated by invited speakers who will present relevant background >>> information or controversial ideas that help participants reach a >>> deeper understanding of the subject. The organizing committee may ask >>> submitters of particularly salient papers to present their ideas and >>> experiences at the workshop. For each slot, there will be one or two >>> invited controversial speakers, and group work on the problem that’s >>> identified, hopefully reaching either a deeper understanding of the >>> problem or some means of approaching it. >>> >>> Important Dates >>> >>> Position papers must be submitted at latest February, 11th, 2011. >>> >>> Submitted position papers will be reviewed immediately by the program >>> organizers and an invitation to the workshop will be sent to one of >>> the paper authors. At latest, invitations will be distributed by >>> February, 25th. >>> >>> This one-day workshop will take place on Friday, 25th March, 2011, >>> right before the 80th IETF meeting in Prague, which starts on Sunday, >>> 27th March. Independently of this workshop but relevant for the >>> participants are tutorial events on Saturday, 26th March 2011. These >>> tutorials will focus on ongoing IETF efforts related to the IETF CORE, >>> ROLL, and 6LOWPAN working groups. >>> >>> Position Papers Requirements >>> >>> Interested parties must submit a brief contribution describing their >>> work or approach as it relates to the workshop theme. We welcome >>> visionary ideas for how to tackle the integration of constraint >>> devices, as well as write-ups of deployment experience, and >>> lessons-learned from successful or failed attempts at integrating >>> these constraint devices with the Internet. Contributions are not >>> required to be original in content. >>> >>> We solicit brief write-ups with 1 or 2 pages, formatted in HTML, PDF, >>> or plain text. We encourage paper authors to focus on the most >>> important challenge. A focused message will be key! Accepted position >>> papers will be published (in addition to meeting minutes, slides, and >>> a workshop report). >>> >>> Please send your position paper to iot-workshop-prep@lists.i1b.org. >>> >>> Venue >>> >>> The planned date and location for the workshop is Friday, March 25th, >>> in Prague. Details about the meeting venue will be provided to the >>> invited workshop participants. During the breaks coffee and tea will >>> be served. >>> >>> There are no plans for remote participation. Minutes of discussions >>> will be available, and offers to organize audio recording would be >>> gladly appreciated. >>> >>> >>> Workshop Organizers >>> >>> We look forward to your input. The workshop organizers are Jari Arkko >>> (Internet Area Director), Hannes Tschofenig (IAB), Bernard Aboba >>> (IAB), Carsten Bormann (core and 6lowpan WG Chair), David Culler (ROLL >>> WG Chair), Lars Eggert (Transport Area Director, and upcoming IRTF >>> Chair), JP Vasseur (ROLL WG Chair), Stewart Bryant (Routing Area >>> Director), Adrian Farrel (Routing Area Director), Ralph Droms >>> (Internet Area Director), Geoffrey Mulligan (6lowpan WG Chair), Alexey >>> Melnikov (Applications Area Director), Peter Saint-Andre (Applications >>> Area Director), Marcelo Bagnulo (IAB), Zach Shelby (protocol >>> author/editor), Isidro Ballesteros Laso (European Commission). >>> >>> More detailed information about the workshop is available at: >>> http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/iot/ >>> >>> Feel free to contact us at iot-workshop-prep@lists.i1b.org. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
- [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Jari Arkko
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Jari Arkko
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Ralph Droms
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Hannes Tschofenig