Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT
Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com> Fri, 24 December 2010 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <geoff@proto6.com>
X-Original-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C25F3A6816 for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:01:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vdFKEASBQfqV for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server2.coslabs.com (server2.coslabs.com [64.111.18.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8503A680B for <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grab (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by server2.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6F51835B; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:03:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [199.233.92.6] (unknown [199.233.92.6]) by grab (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEF57FDB5; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:03:35 -0700 (MST)
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <77850D9C-3546-4A51-9842-CD19DB009D68@gmx.net>
References: <4D121745.5030109@piuha.net> <1293034070.2211.25.camel@d430> <77850D9C-3546-4A51-9842-CD19DB009D68@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:03:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1293210214.1917.3.camel@d430>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:41:30 -0800
Cc: IETF SmartPower Directorate <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT
X-BeenThere: smartpowerdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Members of the Smart Power Directorate <smartpowerdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpowerdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:01:35 -0000
Why not put the tutorials on Friday and the workshop on Saturday. geoff On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 18:23 +0200, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > the suggestion was to have the workshop on Friday and tutorials on Saturday. > > Recently, we organized a privacy workshop in Boston and it was not attached to any other event. Hence, everyone had to travel without any ability to optimize. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote: > > > Jari, > > Is there any way to make this workshop on Saturday? Putting it on > > Friday means that we have to leave the US at the latest by Thursday and > > in reality on Wednesday. Personally this makes it very unlikely that I > > will be able to attend. > > > > Not sure about all the others traveling from the US. > > > > geoff > > > > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:20 +0200, Jari Arkko wrote: > >> Hannes, me, Zack, and a few others have been talking about organizing a > >> workshop right before the next IETF on IOT. Thoughts? Good idea/bad > >> idea? Sufficient participation can be drummed up? > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> Internet Scale Machine-to-Machine Networking > >> > >> Background > >> > >> Today's Internet is experienced by users as a set of applications, > >> such as email, instant messaging, and social networks. While these > >> applications do not require users to be present at the time of service > >> execution in many cases they are. There are also substantial > >> differences in performance between the various end devices, but in > >> general end devices participating in the Internet are considered to be > >> of higher performance. > >> > >> As we move forward with the interconnection of all kinds of devices to > >> the Internet, these characteristics will change. "Internet of Things" > >> is a vision where a large number of devices benefit from the > >> communication services offered by the Internet. Many of these devices > >> are not directly operated by humans, but exist as stand-alone > >> components in buildings, vehicles, and the environment. There will be > >> a lot of variation in the computing power, available memory, and > >> communications bandwidth between different types of devices. > >> > >> Many of these devices provide new services or provide more value for > >> our previously unconnected devices. Some devices have been connected > >> in various legacy means in the past but are now migrating to the use > >> of the Internet Protocol, sharing the same communications medium > >> between all applications and enabling rich communications services. > >> > >> Much of this development can simply run on existing Internet > >> protocols. For instance, home entertainment and monitoring systems > >> often offer a web interface to the end user. In many cases the new, > >> constrained environments can benefit from additional protocols that > >> help optimize the communications and lower the computational > >> requirements. Examples of standardization efforts targeted for these > >> environments include the "Constrained RESTful Environments (core)", > >> IPv6 over Low power WPAN (6lowpan)", Routing Over Low power and Lossy > >> networks (roll)" working groups. > >> > >> This workshop aims to explore the experience and approaches taken by > >> developers of Internet technology, when considering the > >> characteristics of constraint devices. Engineers know that many design > >> considerations need to be taken into account when developing protocols > >> and architecture. Balancing between the conflicting goals of computing > >> performance, code size, economical incentives, and security is often > >> difficult, as illustrated by Clark, et al. in "Tussle in Cyberspace: > >> Defining Tomorrow's Internet", see > >> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/PubPDFs/Tussle2002.pdf > >> > >> This workshop aims to discuss the experience and approaches taken when > >> designing Internet of Things into protocols and architectures. To > >> frame the discussion we suggest, as examples, to investigate the area > >> of integration in the following categories: > >> > >> * scalability > >> * power usage > >> * interworking between different technologies and network domains > >> * usability and manageability > >> * security > >> > >> "To make the Internet work better" is the goal of the IETF and the > >> workshop organizers are interested in receiving contributions and in > >> having discussions that support this goal. Results may lead to > >> guidelines and recommendations, the development of standards, further > >> need for research, or implementation and configuration best current > >> practices. > >> > >> Workshop Style > >> > >> The workshop’s main focus will be on the discussions. In order to keep > >> the group at a manageable size, participants are required to submit a > >> position paper as an expression of interest. Submitters of accepted > >> position papers will be invited to attend the workshop. Active > >> participation will be expected. > >> > >> The workshop will be structured as a series of working sessions > >> punctuated by invited speakers who will present relevant background > >> information or controversial ideas that help participants reach a > >> deeper understanding of the subject. The organizing committee may ask > >> submitters of particularly salient papers to present their ideas and > >> experiences at the workshop. For each slot, there will be one or two > >> invited controversial speakers, and group work on the problem that’s > >> identified, hopefully reaching either a deeper understanding of the > >> problem or some means of approaching it. > >> > >> Important Dates > >> > >> Position papers must be submitted at latest February, 11th, 2011. > >> > >> Submitted position papers will be reviewed immediately by the program > >> organizers and an invitation to the workshop will be sent to one of > >> the paper authors. At latest, invitations will be distributed by > >> February, 25th. > >> > >> This one-day workshop will take place on Friday, 25th March, 2011, > >> right before the 80th IETF meeting in Prague, which starts on Sunday, > >> 27th March. Independently of this workshop but relevant for the > >> participants are tutorial events on Saturday, 26th March 2011. These > >> tutorials will focus on ongoing IETF efforts related to the IETF CORE, > >> ROLL, and 6LOWPAN working groups. > >> > >> Position Papers Requirements > >> > >> Interested parties must submit a brief contribution describing their > >> work or approach as it relates to the workshop theme. We welcome > >> visionary ideas for how to tackle the integration of constraint > >> devices, as well as write-ups of deployment experience, and > >> lessons-learned from successful or failed attempts at integrating > >> these constraint devices with the Internet. Contributions are not > >> required to be original in content. > >> > >> We solicit brief write-ups with 1 or 2 pages, formatted in HTML, PDF, > >> or plain text. We encourage paper authors to focus on the most > >> important challenge. A focused message will be key! Accepted position > >> papers will be published (in addition to meeting minutes, slides, and > >> a workshop report). > >> > >> Please send your position paper to iot-workshop-prep@lists.i1b.org. > >> > >> Venue > >> > >> The planned date and location for the workshop is Friday, March 25th, > >> in Prague. Details about the meeting venue will be provided to the > >> invited workshop participants. During the breaks coffee and tea will > >> be served. > >> > >> There are no plans for remote participation. Minutes of discussions > >> will be available, and offers to organize audio recording would be > >> gladly appreciated. > >> > >> > >> Workshop Organizers > >> > >> We look forward to your input. The workshop organizers are Jari Arkko > >> (Internet Area Director), Hannes Tschofenig (IAB), Bernard Aboba > >> (IAB), Carsten Bormann (core and 6lowpan WG Chair), David Culler (ROLL > >> WG Chair), Lars Eggert (Transport Area Director, and upcoming IRTF > >> Chair), JP Vasseur (ROLL WG Chair), Stewart Bryant (Routing Area > >> Director), Adrian Farrel (Routing Area Director), Ralph Droms > >> (Internet Area Director), Geoffrey Mulligan (6lowpan WG Chair), Alexey > >> Melnikov (Applications Area Director), Peter Saint-Andre (Applications > >> Area Director), Marcelo Bagnulo (IAB), Zach Shelby (protocol > >> author/editor), Isidro Ballesteros Laso (European Commission). > >> > >> More detailed information about the workshop is available at: > >> http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/iot/ > >> > >> Feel free to contact us at iot-workshop-prep@lists.i1b.org. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
- [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Jari Arkko
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Jari Arkko
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Ralph Droms
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [smartpowerdir] planned workshop on IOT Hannes Tschofenig