Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-rfc3850bis-05.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 07 September 2008 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045E3A6959 for <ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.335, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cv0lYEGXTedb for <ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DA43A68AA for <smime-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m87JijO0052536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:44:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m87JijO5052535; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:44:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [8.8.40.152]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m87JiifQ052523 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:44:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from housley@vigilsec.com)
Message-Id: <200809071944.m87JiifQ052523@balder-227.proper.com>
Received: (qmail 2371 invoked by uid 0); 7 Sep 2008 19:44:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (96.255.142.128) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2008 19:44:38 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:44:29 -0400
To: "Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com>, ietf-smime@imc.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-rfc3850bis-05.txt
In-Reply-To: <F815A9EABD2D4B488F792F2FE58B8BAA@Wylie>
References: <F815A9EABD2D4B488F792F2FE58B8BAA@Wylie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

So far, I have not seen any comments on this WG last Call 
thread.  Note that the WG Last Call ends tomorrow.

Russ

At 08:32 PM 8/21/2008, Turner, Sean P. wrote:

>This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document:
>
>  Title  : Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME)
>               Version 3.2 Certificate Handling
>  Author(s)      : S. Turner, B. Ramsdell
>  Filename       : draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-05.txt
>  Pages  : 20
>  Date           : 2008-8-21
>
>This document specifies conventions for X.509 certificate usage by
>Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) agents.  S/MIME
>provides a method to send and receive secure MIME messages, and certificates
>are an integral part of S/MIME agent processing.  S/MIME  agents validate
>certificates as described in RFC 5280, the Internet X.509 Public Key
>Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile.  S/MIME agents must meet the
>certificate processing requirements in this document as well as those in RFC
>5280. This document obsoletes RFC 3850.
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-05.txt
>
>The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has
>achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a
>Standards Track RFC.
>
>Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems.
>Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may be
>sent to the document editor.
>
>The Last Call period will end on 8 September 2008.
>
>Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based upon
>the consensus of the WG. As the authors are also the WG co-chairs, Russ
>Housley has offered to make consensus calls and the WG chairs have agreed to
>abide by Russ's consensus calls.  Possible actions include:
>
>     1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors
>        that the document, after possible editorial or
>        other minor changes, be considered by the IESG
>        for publication as an Informational RFC
>        (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or
>
>     2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately
>        addressed prior to further action (including,
>        possibly, another WG Last Call).
>
>Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to ensure
>the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards process.  So,
>please read and comment!
>
>spt