[smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2027)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 29 January 2010 20:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E9F3A688B for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:51:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ft3BmVAhAwNM for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615513A6848 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15FC1E06B0; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:51:23 -0800 (PST)
To: turners@ieca.com, jimsch@exmsft.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, turners@ieca.com, blaker@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100129205123.15FC1E06B0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:51:23 -0800
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org
Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2027)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smime>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:51:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5752, "Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5752&eid=2027 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 5, pg. 8 Original Text ------------- This section describes recommended processing of signatures when | there are more than one SignerInfo present in a message. This may be due to either multiple SignerInfo objects being present in a single | SignedData object or multiple SignerData objects embedded in each other. [...] Order of operations: 1) Evaluate each SignerInfo object independently. 2) Combine the results of all SignerInfo objects at the same level | (i.e., attached to the same SignerData object). | 3) Combine the results of the nested SignerData objects. Note that this should ignore the presence of other CMS objects between the SignedData objects. Corrected Text -------------- This section describes recommended processing of signatures when | there is more than one SignerInfo object present in a message. This may be due to either multiple SignerInfo objects being present in a | single SignedData object or multiple SignedData objects embedded in each other. [...] Order of operations: 1) Evaluate each SignerInfo object independently. 2) Combine the results of all SignerInfo objects at the same level | (i.e., attached to the same SignedData object). | 3) Combine the results of the nested SignedData objects. Note that this should ignore the presence of other CMS objects between the SignedData objects. Notes ----- Rationale: There's no such ASN.1 type/object "SignerData". Based on the importance of referencing the correct type/object, the correction to "SignedData" is classified as 'Technical'. Also a clarification and fix is applied in the first sentence. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5752 (draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : January 2010 Author(s) : S. Turner, J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2027) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5752 (… Sean Turner