Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2631 (5954)

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Fri, 10 January 2020 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E916C120288 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:42:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqusdVIXNget for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz (mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C99F120830 for <smime@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:42:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1578620520; x=1610156520; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=AGj/xJpLFWVugzc7+DfL0ePZcPqfdFQI4wJOd4kSkpE=; b=payx1IONzLGpqdrSa3Wqa/PsEqmba4Dk0o/ALQ8C/icDLtwWoRDbjsgT 3jG4DQiG4itJfbosg9LPvbVRzU0iUMzkkFrEEppb1U+c+PlLYGdtR2zgp sii5o9DMh4op876iIOvWAhpibVpGp4JOSfYXMOYeipbl5SNnYIqIaMn+5 8nl1BioNg5O86xiaB+5qR9UFmCLzGIuUbw4LoKo4ia58MzbIn+aw8NOHg KjhzR9qYqJq1rQ//hFJHqdIoDvzvTsb1Cuu1zFqwYKSeMuSgXbBHkpncz v3F9Y98y1O4Q0MMjXSdFd8tJVkoiWiSXU63wGIfWzcBIknG6C4ZuNG8sn Q==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,414,1571655600"; d="scan'208";a="109022725"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 10.6.2.4 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from exchangemx.uoa.auckland.ac.nz (HELO uxcn13-ogg-c.UoA.auckland.ac.nz) ([10.6.2.4]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 10 Jan 2020 14:41:58 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.5) by uxcn13-ogg-c.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:41:57 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.5]) by uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.5]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:41:57 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
CC: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "silversplash@gmx.com" <silversplash@gmx.com>, "paul.hoffman@vpnc.org" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2631 (5954)
Thread-Index: AQHVwa03GucJciL21U6Q49JWbzSZuaffTGqAgADDxwCAAxqFWg==
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:41:56 +0000
Message-ID: <1578620520308.60959@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <20200102204220.C652DF40707@rfc-editor.org> <20200108033645.GA57294@kduck.mit.edu>, <875F9475-2444-472E-9B1B-AF8C8691163B@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <875F9475-2444-472E-9B1B-AF8C8691163B@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/BKg1jvZX9n0PFDFPuQdo5nTkEE0>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2631 (5954)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:42:04 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> writes:

>It sounds like Hold for Document Update is the best way to handle this one.

The urgency would also depend on what's affected by it, since it only affects
FIPS 186-style keys which AFAIK nothing uses for DH, everything uses PKCS #3
keys with g=2 (see e.g. RFC 2409, RFC 3526, and RFC 7919).

Peter.