Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (6942)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1C1C1595E5 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1NCJAzyFKKj for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E37FC159525 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4D5427C642; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejewh_Ibkpir; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5DA5427C641; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220425111718.EAC356A9EE@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:55:03 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FED1911B-F205-49B1-AF6F-D69039E9293F@amsl.com>
References: <20220425111718.EAC356A9EE@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: samuel.lee@microsoft.com, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, jimsch@exmsft.com, IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/DY4v6DjVuLAlKbOTg97MDVlMPSM>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (6942)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:55:09 -0000
Greetings, We note that this erratum reports the same issue as was reported in errata report 284 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid284) We will remove eid6942 unless we hear any objections. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Apr 25, 2022, at 4:17 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394, > "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6942 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Samuel Lee <samuel.lee@microsoft.com> > > Section: 2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > R[i] An array of 64-bit registers where > i = 0, 1, 2, ..., n > A[t], R[i][t] The contents of registers A and R[i] after encryption > step t. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > R[i] An array of 64-bit registers where > i = 1, 2, ..., n > A[t], R[t][i] The contents of registers A and R[i] after encryption > step t. > > Notes > ----- > 1) There are n 64-bit registers indexed R[1] to R[n] in the algorithms in section 2.2. > 2) The notation of the algorithms in section 2.2 dereference R[][] using the step as the first index, and the index of the register from 1 to n as the second index > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm > Publication Date : September 2002 > Author(s) : J. Schaad, R. Housley > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : S/MIME Mail Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (6942) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [smime] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Editorial Errata Repo… Samuel Lee
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Chris Smiley