Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath
"Hajek, Juraj" <Juraj.Hajek@ardaco.com> Fri, 03 November 2017 10:10 UTC
Return-Path: <Juraj.Hajek@ardaco.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D387A13FD4B for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0pSwkOKstbsG for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsi.ardaco.com (xsi.ardaco.com [90.176.8.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCD613FD3E for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XSI.ardaco.local (10.0.0.66) by XSI.ardaco.local (10.0.0.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:09:54 +0100
Received: from XSI.ardaco.local ([::1]) by XSI.ardaco.local ([::1]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.004; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:09:54 +0100
From: "Hajek, Juraj" <Juraj.Hajek@ardaco.com>
To: "smime@ietf.org" <smime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath
Thread-Index: AdNT4+iFLs2Ns6S0Qz2BTL/bzmrqigAp+NgQ
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:09:54 +0000
Message-ID: <e80f72fa03ee41efb9c8a3bcf396be44@XSI.ardaco.local>
References: <73d57ce76d7a43b38666557558a5d9a7@XSI.ardaco.local>
In-Reply-To: <73d57ce76d7a43b38666557558a5d9a7@XSI.ardaco.local>
Accept-Language: sk-SK, en-US
Content-Language: sk-SK
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-oldmsgid: <e80f72fa03ee41efb9c8a3bcf396be44@XSI.ardaco.local>
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.182]
x-gfi-smtp-submission: 1
x-gfi-smtp-hellodomain: XSI.ardaco.local
x-gfi-smtp-remoteip: 10.0.0.66
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e80f72fa03ee41efb9c8a3bcf396be44XSIardacolocal_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/Es0zHYJ6g589deJ1WizUTrUgrSI>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:31:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:13:51 -0000
Hello, we are not sure about the interpretation of the following sentence in RFC3125 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3125/?include_text=1). CertRefReq and CertInfoReq, p.9 "References for full cert path up to a trust point required" Does it mean that the trust point should be included or excluded in the path? Thank you very much. Best regards, Juraj Hájek Project Manager Ardaco, a.s.
- Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullP… Hajek, Juraj
- Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullP… Jim Schaad