Question about security of header.
Taweesak Chairatanayut <pok@nectec.or.th> Fri, 26 February 1999 09:36 UTC
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id BAA26420 for ietf-smime-bks; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 01:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nucleus.nectec.or.th (nucleus.nectec.or.th [202.44.204.9]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA26402 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 01:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (pok@localhost) by nucleus.nectec.or.th (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA10638 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:41:17 +0700 (GMT+0700)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:41:12 +0700
From: Taweesak Chairatanayut <pok@nectec.or.th>
To: ietf-smime@imc.org
Subject: Question about security of header.
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990226161840.11373B-100000@nucleus.nectec.or.th>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Dear all, According to rfc of S/MIME V.2.0, i have a question about header. How can i be so sure that the header of e-mail didn't be changed because from S/MIME V.2.0 i couldn't find that header can be authenticated or not ( i think no, right ?). Do you have any idea of header authentication ? Please advise. Regards, Pok. Mr. Taweesak Chairatanayut < E-mail:pok@nectec.or.th > System Engineer -------------------------------------------------------- Network Technology Laboratory, National Electronics and Computer Technology Center Tel: (662) 642-7077 Ext. 5010, Fax: (662) 642-7064 -------------------------------------------------------- ____ ____ _ _ ( _ \ ( ) ( \( ) | __/ | ++ | | + ( (__) (____) (_)\_)
- RE: Question about security of header. Taweesak Chairatanayut
- RE: Question about security of header. Blake Ramsdell
- Question about security of header. Taweesak Chairatanayut