[smime] [Errata Verified] RFC3125 (5901)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 January 2022 02:01 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2B33A1442; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nz0VTjCKQst; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DA33A143B; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 90A01ECB80; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:58 -0800 (PST)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, harri.rasilainen@etsi.fr, ross@secstan.com, Denis.Pinkas@bull.net, pope@secstan.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, smime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220120020058.90A01ECB80@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:58 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/Kd1F92HSBBjYJgkr5AA_9eWA6u0>
Subject: [smime] [Errata Verified] RFC3125 (5901)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 02:01:15 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC3125, "Electronic Signature Policies". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5901 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date Reported: 2019-11-12 Verified by: Roman Danyliw (IESG) Section: Appendix A.1 Original Text ------------- CommitmentType ::= SEQUENCE { identifier CommitmentTypeIdentifier, fieldOfApplication [0] FieldOfApplication OPTIONAL, semantics [1] DirectoryString OPTIONAL } Corrected Text -------------- CommitmentType ::= SEQUENCE { identifier CommitmentTypeIdentifier, fieldOfApplication [0] FieldOfApplication OPTIONAL, semantics [1] DirectoryString OPTIONAL } CommitmentTypeIdentifier ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER Notes ----- The definition of CommitmentTypeIdentifier is missing from the ASN.1 module. RFC 3126 shows that it is an object identifier. -------------------------------------- RFC3125 (draft-ietf-smime-espolicies-00) -------------------------------------- Title : Electronic Signature Policies Publication Date : September 2001 Author(s) : J. Ross, D. Pinkas, N. Pope Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [smime] [Errata Verified] RFC3125 (5901) RFC Errata System