Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (6942)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 25 April 2022 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EFA3A19FB; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIzEc6wX28Uu; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224D53A19E9; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EEC16D485; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E006D16D396; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B79C6239-9D15-4560-BB1E-E4B7E680D0F0@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:19:44 -0400
Cc: samuel.lee@microsoft.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <152C01FC-BF8A-4304-9D9E-EC9898754BB6@vigilsec.com>
References: <20220425111718.EAC356A9EE@rfcpa.amsl.com> <B79C6239-9D15-4560-BB1E-E4B7E680D0F0@vigilsec.com>
To: IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/Lbw7iY48GdUpfaBxDK9DBC39x7Q>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (6942)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:19:51 -0000

Digging deeper, I realize that this error was previously reported: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid284

Maybe we should change the status of the original report to approved.

Russ


> On Apr 25, 2022, at 10:14 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> I just compared this to NIST SP 800-38F, and it looks to me like this mistake has been in the document unnoticed for a very long time.  The algorithm description in Section 2.2 seems to be correct, but the notation description in Section 2.1 has an error.
> 
> Can someone else take a look?  Obviously, by coauthor cannot help any longer...
> 
> Russ
> 
>> On Apr 25, 2022, at 7:17 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394,
>> "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6942
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Samuel Lee <samuel.lee@microsoft.com>
>> 
>> Section: 2.1
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> R[i]          An array of 64-bit registers where
>>                      i = 0, 1, 2, ..., n
>> A[t], R[i][t] The contents of registers A and R[i] after encryption
>>                      step t.
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> R[i]          An array of 64-bit registers where
>>                      i = 1, 2, ..., n
>> A[t], R[t][i] The contents of registers A and R[i] after encryption
>>                      step t.
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> 1) There are n 64-bit registers indexed R[1] to R[n] in the algorithms in section 2.2.
>> 2) The notation of the algorithms in section 2.2 dereference R[][] using the step as the first index, and the index of the register from 1 to n as the second index
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm
>> Publication Date    : September 2002
>> Author(s)           : J. Schaad, R. Housley
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> smime mailing list
> smime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime