RFC 2634 Questions
suchet singh khalsa <suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com> Wed, 27 August 2003 17:42 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA21487 for <smime-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7RGtOgc075963 for <ietf-smime-bks@above.proper.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7RGtO1l075962 for ietf-smime-bks; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from web11803.mail.yahoo.com (web11803.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.157]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with SMTP id h7RGtNgc075954 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:55:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030827165524.2132.qmail@web11803.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [148.87.1.171] by web11803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:55:24 PDT
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:55:24 -0700
From: suchet singh khalsa <suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com>
Subject: RFC 2634 Questions
To: phoffman@imc.org
Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Hi Paul, Can you please answer the following questions w.r.t MLA processing of S/MIME messages : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to RFC 2632, while verifying signatures it should confirmed that the sender (RFC822 From or Sender headers) of the message is the same as the signed entity. Does this apply to ONLY the innermost signature in a triple wrapped message ? If no, this will impact MLA processing as documented in RFC 2634 in the following manner : 1. The MLA creates an outermost SignedData layer using the private key of the list. The final recipient will not be able to verify this signature since the From header is not the list email address. Is the solution here to set the list email address as the RFC 822 Sender header ? 2. Most MLA's support mail merge functionality. Is the intent of RFC 2634 to mandate that S/MIME and mail merge do not go hand in hand ? The reason for this question is : When MLA does mail merge, the innermost signature in a triple wrapped message will become invalid - so the MLA will have to sign with the private key of the list. So, the end recipient will not be able to verify this signature since the From header of the mail is not the list email address. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ RFC 2634 does not talk about this case : An application/pkcs7-mime bodypart is enclosed in another multipart, so that it is not the level 1 bodypart. What should the MLA do in this case ? Possibilities are : 1. Create the outermost signature (according to RFC2634 page 34) for the whole mail. 2. Create the outermost signature (according to RFC2634 page 34) only for the application/pkcs7-mime content. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks, Suchet __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
- RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- Re: RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Russ Housley
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad