Re: RFC 2634 Questions
suchet singh khalsa <suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com> Mon, 01 September 2003 08:05 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA01551 for <smime-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:05:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h817NDgc057825 for <ietf-smime-bks@above.proper.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:23:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h817ND19057824 for ietf-smime-bks; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from web11807.mail.yahoo.com (web11807.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.161]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with SMTP id h817NCgc057813 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:23:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030901072312.51857.qmail@web11807.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [148.87.1.171] by web11807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:23:12 PDT
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:23:12 -0700
From: suchet singh khalsa <suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 2634 Questions
To: phoffman@imc.org
Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Hi, Resending due to no response. Can anybody please help me with these questions... Thanks in advance, Suchet --- suchet singh khalsa <suchetsinghkhalsa@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > Can you please answer the following questions > w.r.t > MLA processing of S/MIME messages : > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > According to RFC 2632, while verifying signatures it > should confirmed that the sender (RFC822 From or > Sender headers) of the message is the same as the > signed entity. Does this apply to ONLY the innermost > signature in a triple wrapped message ? > If no, this will impact MLA processing as documented > in RFC 2634 in the following manner : > > 1. The MLA creates an outermost SignedData layer > using the private key of the list. The final > recipient > will not be able to verify this signature since the > From header is not the list email address. Is the > solution here to set the list email address as the > RFC > 822 Sender header ? > > 2. Most MLA's support mail merge functionality. Is > the intent of RFC 2634 to mandate that S/MIME and > mail > merge do not go hand in hand ? The reason for this > question is : When MLA does mail merge, the > innermost > signature in a triple wrapped message will become > invalid - so the MLA will have to sign with the > private key of the list. So, the end recipient will > not be able to verify this signature since the From > header of the mail is not the list email address. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > RFC 2634 does not talk about this case : > An application/pkcs7-mime bodypart is enclosed in > another multipart, so that it is not the level 1 > bodypart. What should the MLA do in this case ? > Possibilities are : > 1. Create the outermost signature (according to > RFC2634 page 34) for the whole mail. > > 2. Create the outermost signature (according to > RFC2634 page 34) only for the application/pkcs7-mime > content. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Thanks, > Suchet > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site > design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
- RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- Re: RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Russ Housley
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions suchet singh khalsa
- RE: RFC 2634 Questions Jim Schaad