Re: [smime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 20 March 2018 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD096126B6D for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBEizzjhk7qY for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22d.google.com (mail-pl0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9E1126CD8 for <smime@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b7-v6so680405plr.8 for <smime@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W/IVbf53Glx884NC9ISVcU6DfK62Y/YtT6c+SNMBvT0=; b=kPfgOIFFGiggj+d6YKdyuY4WoJhcc7NXvKIoI+8NBBGKuPZgq4PpxWrQaY9q9Ov1wy oVq9vkcjcwwlTrEwqziVkY6BTeBtH6hIonCs77MHqr5Hhf2UAn/+5J3RNcRYACBR8fs+ cThLAomi4iMdy6Kd6DHmYmvRYPLNWppcD56CA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W/IVbf53Glx884NC9ISVcU6DfK62Y/YtT6c+SNMBvT0=; b=TitDX21IP3AntKYxKuqEbR2G+qCOyRG+OgJFJYzaBd8Yz1fzpk/KnlKwTZ0W29lxCW eV85Opjz4Hh5uWMs1ckmP7mFPUZmzvL/xG5oT1RIWJMt1rf0rcmmLUvo8/EYEkOT2uDG s3rwCQ4rzYVD7mI0asMqXndMcE/D1E2IEqWIxLmNbrULdUhMW/j48ZvQrSYs2jJ6Av/o QTa10S3+1P9vBvINReGHYqsupKcyD91SgUygoYtPmJrESbx1aWWWzhaZEomTgpZjDx/V d4nB5IhnJEEP/aLIVm7+khgCL832MDOYAfOwkyY+kNrkHeRZkpunnz95A9QJVFPBu8nl AcSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FYAOqLRyYO3QR3qcBZpo82WQ7+IY3FkU3TlNjBrMXRRWjVnneL dQMDwU42j0tGugy/qkOyH1GVug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtIMTN4VxOaF0nt8dZif8ll3MOiXG6ky1Xk1jHpPdazK7ERSXOo4UcxFwNw1oT1Td3w3HIEqg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc88:: with SMTP id bb8-v6mr4153553plb.214.1521540850738; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:d91e:da89:fabf:9e56? ([2001:67c:370:1998:d91e:da89:fabf:9e56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y18sm2593976pfe.67.2018.03.20.03.14.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180319105228.038E4B81B74@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:14:03 +0000
Cc: Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A49F52BF-FD29-4E8A-86DA-D50A0F80614F@sn3rd.com>
References: <20180319105228.038E4B81B74@rfc-editor.org>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/Q9bpef_u-ITeUD4WD8JFOavUY1c>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:14:13 -0000


> On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:52, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> Any objections to adding a note in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis along the same lines as the note for receipentKeyId?

It’s slightly different than renaming receipentKeyId because this is an OID so you could also do this:

id-aa-encryptKeyPref OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-encrypKeyPref 

But I also don’t have an issue with just adding the note.

spt