Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)
"Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 03:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFCB21F8503 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LN-ZvIPfLv-n for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C521F8501 for <smime@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tobias (50-39-234-129.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.234.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B7D138F05; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:29:47 -0700
Message-ID: <012a01cd96e0$34c37d80$9e4a7880$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGg2KVXljLfnjMqfy4E0I8zi8LnVwIl8w5YAcw62nOXzH2OgA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, smime@ietf.org, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smime>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:31:20 -0000
I would make it Corrected Text -------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[s] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[s][i] > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: rhousley@rsasecurity.com; stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; turners@ieca.com; > blaker@gmail.com; dlitz@dlitz.net; smime@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) > > On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com> > wrote: > > > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. > > > > > > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 > > the value of t might not be well defined, however > > > > 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be > > redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both > > locations that it occurs. > > So, you have an alternate errata to propose? > > --Paul Hoffman
- [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Jim Schaad
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Jim Schaad
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (… Dwayne Litzenberger