[smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5754 (2025)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 28 January 2010 01:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C103A6AF7 for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8e+vIGEw+3k2 for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5E73A6AF0 for <smime@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DADDCE0697; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:51 -0800 (PST)
To: turners@ieca.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, turners@ieca.com, blaker@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100128010551.DADDCE0697@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:51 -0800
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org
Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5754 (2025)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smime>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:05:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5754, "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5754&eid=2025 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 2.4, pg. 6 Original Text ------------- 2.4. SHA-512 [...] | The SMIMECapabilities attribute value indicates support for SHA-384 in a SEQUENCE with the capabilityID field containing the object | identifier id-sha384 with absent parameters. The DER encoding for this SMIMECapability value is: id-sha512: 30 0b 06 09 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 03 Corrected Text -------------- 2.4. SHA-512 [...] | The SMIMECapabilities attribute value indicates support for SHA-512 in a SEQUENCE with the capabilityID field containing the object | identifier id-sha512 with absent parameters. The DER encoding for this SMIMECapability value is: id-sha512: 30 0b 06 09 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 03 Notes ----- Rationale: Undetected copy&paste error, but significant (therefore classified as Technical) Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5754 (draft-ietf-smime-sha2-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax Publication Date : January 2010 Author(s) : S. Turner Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5754 (2025) RFC Errata System