Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2029)

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

The proposed correction is appropriate, and does not result in a 
technical change to the RFC. I have no objection to this errata.

spt

RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5752,
> "Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5752&eid=2029
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 4.1, pg. 7
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    - The signer MUST:
> 
>      -- Retain the existing signerInfo objects.
> 
> |    -- Include their signerInfo object(s).
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    - The signer MUST:
> 
>      -- Retain the existing signerInfo objects.
> 
> |    -- Include their own signerInfo object(s).
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Rationale: Remove possible ambiguity of language.
>   (Keep for update!)
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5752 (draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
> Publication Date    : January 2010
> Author(s)           : S. Turner, J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>