[smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (6835)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 03 February 2022 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6093A0E6B for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:53:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4RkKdmBn2ioo for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC583A0E69 for <smime@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1FA9AEB6D0; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:52:55 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ericcro@amazon.com, housley@vigilsec.com, smime@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220203215255.1FA9AEB6D0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:52:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/eRCMN6EWyLD2XCX1H8vKFfOl_Fw>
Subject: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (6835)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 21:53:02 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5084,
"Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6835

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Eric Crockett <ericcro@amazon.com>

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
A brief summary of the properties of AES-CCM is provided in Section 1.5.

Corrected Text
--------------
A brief summary of the properties of AES-GCM is provided in Section 1.5.

Notes
-----
Sections 3.2 and 1.5 are about AES-GCM, the text refers to AES-CCM.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5084 (draft-ietf-smime-cms-aes-ccm-and-gcm-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Publication Date    : November 2007
Author(s)           : R. Housley
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG