Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2028)
Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Fri, 29 January 2010 21:15 UTC
Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EB83A6967 for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lNOzJU6+roa for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp106.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 653713A6943 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 62249 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 21:16:13 -0000
Received: from pool-96-231-119-106.washdc.east.verizon.net (turners@96.231.119.106 with plain) by smtp106.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 13:16:13 -0800 PST
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ
X-YMail-OSG: lBIZlOEVM1l52w_tIlp0ZehBoekF_jdxJybJiWPQlYfi6PaR_gkrfauEjAUV1Y3VjeKSfIHAv6iNh6h5veHQ_z82R1yJojrh6tHvDmJVeOWvPUyWZaTjFEhPpapTLxWQZ841SfgSeeRaOwCZ7vg9HT20y5dbkXnp4Mvb4dRbXtAddAsPN1x6R8KZZaunYHkhGCpedF5TSU00pl1TARtTlaQBXJGCm2Nn01geG.qWPJ6I7MjimT9mEda.FjHHf.99FinKPpSsEl__DpRivlhXmAxEMOf0iW6JD87s9iVyAGIKlfWy.hTwiRQiolS.acj7PL9ok5InoM_BNweKCTmNtnnmKpnKG7juSMW4Og1bnwhA2zowc8Lj.nzglNQl.zWAP7plw1SFe4Yr1cXpdUiz_u9SrHSeRchtBuQVe7TPv55aRiP9e5AzRwZRxkuIqw_O9cpYvflxwU6SQt4gwQw3lljWFUV5LvZkt6coZCZFlhaWGz59W0Zrx_kkm_THIIShv.DTmg1zZ.KuiNPpApPEwqUeCi8bchh8yw1tWJESXd31apvC9jsq9CPHm.tZTDvVBAwJkjZ2E7UPCa8-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4B63501C.9080701@ieca.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:16:12 -0500
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20100129205451.749E7E06B3@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100129205451.749E7E06B3@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, smime@ietf.org, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, jimsch@exmsft.com
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2028)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smime>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:15:56 -0000
The proposed correction is appropriate, and does not result in a technical change to the RFC. I have no objection to this errata. spt RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5752, > "Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5752&eid=2028 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > Section: 2.1, pg. 6 > > Original Text > ------------- > The following is an example: > > SignedData > DigestAlg=sha1,sha256 > SignerInfo1 SignerInfo2 > digestAlg=sha1 digestAlg=sha256 > signatureAlg=dsawithsha1 signatureAlg=ecdsawithsha256 > signedAttrs= signedAttrs= > signingTime1 signingTime1 > messageDigest1 messageDigest2 > multiSig1= multiSig2= > bodyHash=sha256 bodyHash=sha1 > signAlg=ecdsawithsha256 signAlg=dsawithsha1 > | signAttrsHash= signAttrsHash= > | algID=sha1 algID=sha256 > | hash=value1 hash=value2 > > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The following is an example: > > SignedData > DigestAlg=sha1,sha256 > SignerInfo1 SignerInfo2 > digestAlg=sha1 digestAlg=sha256 > signatureAlg=dsawithsha1 signatureAlg=ecdsawithsha256 > signedAttrs= signedAttrs= > signingTime1 signingTime1 > messageDigest1 messageDigest2 > multiSig1= multiSig2= > bodyHash=sha256 bodyHash=sha1 > signAlg=ecdsawithsha256 signAlg=dsawithsha1 > | signAttrsHash= signAttrsHash= > | algID=sha1 algID=sha256 > | hash=value1 hash=value2 > > > > > Notes > ----- > Rationale: > Fixed indentation for consistency and clarity > (visual indication of subordinate elements). > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5752 (draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) > Publication Date : January 2010 > Author(s) : S. Turner, J. Schaad > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : S/MIME Mail Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2028) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (… Sean Turner