Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5035 (6735)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Fri, 12 November 2021 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E503A0788 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3LYuiVrmlRg5 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCACB3A0787 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974B64237BF8; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWkMd6nX8wl2; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ED7D428B4E5; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <F105B2C3-4EE6-4C10-879D-3EA63E638CE7@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:12 -0800
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, jimsch@exmsft.com, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, Blake Ramsdell <blaker@gmail.com>, ernstl@fenestrae.com, IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01ADCF92-C7C8-4FF7-8749-EA16A0C68691@amsl.com>
References: <20211112150108.1C748232585@rfc-editor.org> <F105B2C3-4EE6-4C10-879D-3EA63E638CE7@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/nvkWB1TbHFHHV1g-dt0aFtw14AM>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5035 (6735)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 22:44:19 -0000
Hi Russ, Per your request, errata 6735 has been rejected. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Nov 12, 2021, at 11:22 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > RFC Editor, please reject this errata report. > > The AlgorithmIdentifier is defined as: > > AlgorithmIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE { > algorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER, > parameters ANY DEFINED BY algorithm OPTIONAL } > > The syntax is saying that the DEFAULT value for the is algorithm field is id-sha256 and the optional parameters are absent. > > Russ > >> On Nov 12, 2021, at 10:01 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5035, >> "Enhanced Security Services (ESS) Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6735 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Ernst Lawende <ernstl@fenestrae.com> >> >> Section: 4 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> ESSCertIDv2 ::= SEQUENCE { >> hashAlgorithm AlgorithmIdentifier >> DEFAULT {algorithm id-sha256}, >> certHash Hash, >> issuerSerial IssuerSerial OPTIONAL >> } >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> ESSCertIDv2 ::= SEQUENCE { >> hashAlgorithm AlgorithmIdentifier >> DEFAULT {id-sha256}, >> certHash Hash, >> issuerSerial IssuerSerial OPTIONAL >> } >> >> Notes >> ----- >> No value assignment for 'algorithm' exists, and the definition of id-sha256 already contains the full object identifier. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5035 (draft-ietf-smime-escertid-06) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Enhanced Security Services (ESS) Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility >> Publication Date : August 2007 >> Author(s) : J. Schaad >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : S/MIME Mail Security >> Area : Security >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> smime mailing list >> smime@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime >
- [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5035 (6735) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5035 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5035 (… Chris Smiley