RFC 1524
Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr> Fri, 20 September 1996 12:54 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa25331; 20 Sep 96 8:54 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09856; 20 Sep 96 8:54 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net (8.7.6/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA28819; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 08:35:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cf01 (cledf.edf.fr [192.54.193.133]) by list.cren.net (8.7.6/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA28793 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 08:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from clserv02.edf.fr (clserv02.edf.fr [130.98.118.118]) by cf01 (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA06762 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 14:35:41 +0200
Received: from cli51ak.der.edf.fr (cli51ak.der.edf.fr [130.98.16.29]) by clserv02.edf.fr (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA03664 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 14:33:57 +0200
Received: by cli51ak.der.edf.fr (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA21626; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 14:31:51 +0100
Message-Id: <9609201331.AA21626@cli51ak.der.edf.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 14:31:51 +0100
Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr>
To: ietf-822@list.cren.net
Subject: RFC 1524
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MEUF [Mail Extended Using Faces v3.0.1 beta 1.1-full-mimePL1]
X-Face: *dox%[8w46-IvZEW0+_?[n7gJ/>szi|{4(yhP|Z4A%a#Cq5.vT+(5d~S&DyO%.5-.[O=9.z [<CXO>8:KcY&=@#P4-!5v:];A?Z+
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Hello, I'd like to know if a revision of RFC 1524 is planned, in conjunction with the current revision of MIME ? It seems to me that the format of the mailcap file can be, for the benefit of all, extended in many ways, and support for instance a default "inline" or "attachment" in all mailcap entries. There are some other fields I'd really like to discuss in the mailcap format. Thanks. Regards from Paris, </daniel>
- RFC 1524 Daniel Glazman
- Re: RFC 1524 Daniel Glazman