Re: header-munging
Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no> Sun, 18 August 1996 13:50 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa15693; 18 Aug 96 9:50 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa15689; 18 Aug 96 9:50 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06045;
18 Aug 96 9:50 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA19622; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:12:13 -0400
Received: from lupinella.troll.no (root@lupinella.troll.no [195.0.192.30]) by
list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA19602 for
<ietf-smtp@list.cren.net>; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:11:52 -0400
Received: from lupinella.troll.no ([195.0.254.19]) by lupinella.troll.no with
ESMTP id <13970-222>; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:11:49 +0100
Message-Id: <96Aug18.151149+0100met_dst.13970-222+90@lupinella.troll.no>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:11:46 +0200
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no>
To: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Subject: Re: header-munging
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:08:09 +0200"
References: <96Aug18.150812+0100met_dst.13970-222+89@lupinella.troll.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.30.1
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
[I'm putting in this extra line just so the list processor won't be nervous] SUBMIT is intended to differentiate between well-written, properly conforming SMTP clients and badly written, nonconforming SMTP clients. It does this by asking the _badly_ written clients to do something differentiating. It appears to me that there's a better chance of success if it's the well-written clients that have to differentiate themselves. Ie. the ESMTP keyword should tell the SMTP server to not edit the message at all (except C-T-E downgrading and adding a Received header), and that the server may reject the DATA command if the essage has syntax errors. Have I missed something obvious? --Arnt
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Michael D'Errico
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging mark
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Michael D'Errico
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Tim Goodwin
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Tim Goodwin
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging John W. Noerenberg
- Re: header-munging Harald.T.Alvestrand
- Re: header-munging Tim Goodwin
- Re: header-munging Einar Stefferud
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Tim Goodwin
- Re: header-munging Einar Stefferud
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Tim Goodwin
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Mark Horton
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging D. J. Bernstein
- Re: header-munging Randall C. Gellens
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Ned Freed
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Keith Moore
- Re: header-munging Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: header-munging Harald.T.Alvestrand
- Re: header-munging Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: header-munging RANDY
- Re: header-munging RANDY
- Re: header-munging RANDY