IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: header-munging

Tim Goodwin <tim@uunet.pipex.com> Fri, 13 September 1996 12:15 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa28283; 13 Sep 96 8:15 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06073; 13 Sep 96 8:15 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA11073; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 07:43:31 -0400
Received: from quay.pipex.net (quay.pipex.net [158.43.128.34]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA11060 for <ietf-smtp@list.cren.net>; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 07:43:11 -0400
Received: (qmail 25844 invoked from smtpd); 13 Sep 1996 11:43:08 -0000
Received: from pool.pipex.net (HELO pool.uunet.pipex.com) (158.43.128.24) by quay.pipex.net with SMTP; 13 Sep 1996 11:43:08 -0000
Message-Id: <AABnKzI5SMsADG5s@pipe.pipex.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 12:43:07 +0100
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
From: Tim Goodwin <tim@uunet.pipex.com>
To: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Subject: Re: header-munging
In-Reply-To: <ELMU0925ECE2B0@MPA15AB>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

> The I-D draft-gellens-submit-01.txt proposes an ESMTP keyword to specify
> RELAY or SUBMIT, and also suggests an optional additional port.

Please, no.  We're not ISO, nor hostage to any prior art.  Let's
do one or the other, but not both.

Tim.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email