Re: Restricting the list
Ned Freed <NED@innosoft.com> Mon, 05 February 1996 18:24 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05143;
5 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05139;
5 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11400;
5 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA11338; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:24:12 -0500
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM (THOR.INNOSOFT.COM [192.160.253.66]) by
list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA11303;
Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:23:39 -0500
Received: from INNOSOFT.COM by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-6 #2001)
id <01I0TIKXK0SW96VZA6@INNOSOFT.COM>; Mon, 05 Feb 1996 10:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <01I0UN2J9NKS96VZA6@INNOSOFT.COM>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 10:19:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ned Freed <NED@innosoft.com>
To: conklin@info.cren.net
Cc: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net, ietf-822@list.cren.net
Subject: Re: Restricting the list
In-Reply-To: "Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 1996 11:21:41 +0100"
<199602051616.LAA29953@info.cren.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0(dev) -- ListProcessor by CREN
> I'm also considering making restricting posting to the subscribers to the > list, which is more restrictive than the normal situation for ietf lists, > so I'd like to get your reactions to that before I do so. I propose that > such a restriction is not overly troublesome because (1) anyone can still > subscribe if posting is that important) and (2) postings are really > meaningful only from people that are fimiliar to the list. This is not acceptable. I routinely post from a variety of different addresses, not just from the address I happen to be subscribed under. I have neither the time nor interest in figuring out the address I happen to be subscribed under in order to get my postings accepted. Deleting the occasional advertisment that makes it through is an extremely minor nuisance by comparison. My participation in these lists will end the minute such a policy is instituted. Ned
- Restricting the list Jim Conklin
- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Restricting the list Roger Fajman
- Re: Restricting the list John W. Noerenberg
- PS -- Re: Restricting the list Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Restricting the list Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Restricting the list Jay
- Re: Restricting the list Ben Nowlin
- Re: PS -- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list John W. Noerenberg
- Re: Restricting the list RANDY
- Re: Restricting the list Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Restricting the list keld
- Re: Restricting the list Lindsay
- Re: Restricting the list Einar Stefferud
- Re: Restricting the list Jim Conklin
- Re: Restricting the list Tim Kehres