IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Snac] I-D Action: draft-ietf-snac-simple-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 21 February 2023 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CD3C15171B for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pVKtMbjpRS2X for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42588C14CE5D for <snac@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23463898C; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:10:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LA2Bw6uYX_m1; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:10:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1283898B; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:10:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1676992239; bh=yMLZ7+YVLavzrNLmm4TgF1oz7P0beYwUd0U89Q6BQSY=; h=From:to:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lSo0hp0RyuyBmnc3J2KgYBw1K4L++rgr8RTxrygNCmyLtKegkgTiQZf1xvT1iN5f8 ZnW/LZik83FKRr4IORZ+k6yddsfI8bDnlOWIhoZX75WZktSsv+92X8QFt+2emZBUCb uBWATr1DvAf2y5qCzZAhvAZVE+N3HOm+S94TndTX0Kzz/c6gTTzwnCbzgP+GY9VtFB LCtz0msrvw+vO5c4wffQvTwq455cHxLQejWFhI//P4DnMLLK59VQ6yU4Y4kMEFY63v xN9TgXceUzYy2qp62ZldNArBD8VDb2FDrDvBAnzDkUlX4TzSJudL4y11O1IWj0vGHe PVZfRlc2/gQfQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183121CC; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:39:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>, "snac@ietf.org" <snac@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <25382.1676987732@localhost>
References: <167631700481.44401.16650680728729430437@ietfa.amsl.com> <m1pma4sfrl.fsf@narrans.de> <CAPt1N1mXF6qc__ELjArge3RfT1PvkzuzZLwHA_2bWp361+wNwA@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978720103FADEF84B36E71DFDA59@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <25382.1676987732@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:39:23 -0500
Message-ID: <7479.1676990363@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/snac/OsIc_PT4a_N7-f6zZyOXw6idpXU>
Subject: Re: [Snac] I-D Action: draft-ietf-snac-simple-00.txt
X-BeenThere: snac@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussing problems relating to the automatic connection of stub networks to existing infrastructure networks. " <snac.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/snac/>
List-Post: <mailto:snac@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:39:30 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    >> What about the case where DHCPv6-PD is available, but the stub router
    >> doesn’t get the desired prefix length or encounters some error in the
    >> process?

    > What are the situations where a SNAC Stub Router would more address space than a
    > single /64?

What are the situations where a SNAC Stub Router would *REQUIRE* more address space than a
single /64?



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email