IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Snac] I-D Action: draft-ietf-snac-simple-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 21 February 2023 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9A1C14CE2F for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 05:55:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQO3vVoKZNfv for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 05:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B7BC14F727 for <snac@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 05:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40F13898C; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:26:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EWffvoJ6-xn2; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48353898B; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:26:48 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1676989608; bh=AntDfSpVQFKe9J1tMIDC0477n/z3r6ffRHa6W6A9k0g=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=I9kqjv5iry4rz/ZA1LXGZLi5KVvnG4Ow5uupmyHi/IIBKyuzPtcQx0fxcmS2k9d8J uzLZfirnnRWBR9ap+Oajt4lIl0lUwRwgL5NdwHRPQ2/0XpSDNCbl7E+0Ph3608nehk 9K/ZYQYb6x9KaSYEb+8WY4wy5kF9MUaZv/leox8rbgM8Lpomxb5yXAW8/b9oVWGiiu 42jBkHadfF+yR+v9acxr1b6l33x0pYMO5jWCX2fKLPs779Mih2Ch32MHo/Ma8GGxjG Tq+gc0dCqd1l9xl6fDmyk3oYZ1z3xfFtapnK1+QZhSDzpZ6chExFwhUsN9AVdNTVMh j7tvxorbUMtqw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD4598; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:55:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>, "snac@ietf.org" <snac@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DU0P190MB1978720103FADEF84B36E71DFDA59@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <167631700481.44401.16650680728729430437@ietfa.amsl.com> <m1pma4sfrl.fsf@narrans.de> <CAPt1N1mXF6qc__ELjArge3RfT1PvkzuzZLwHA_2bWp361+wNwA@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978720103FADEF84B36E71DFDA59@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:55:32 -0500
Message-ID: <25382.1676987732@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/snac/tIh7SKpFEu6ZpSf7FmM7smThpWU>
Subject: Re: [Snac] I-D Action: draft-ietf-snac-simple-00.txt
X-BeenThere: snac@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussing problems relating to the automatic connection of stub networks to existing infrastructure networks. " <snac.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/snac/>
List-Post: <mailto:snac@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:55:41 -0000

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    > What about the case where DHCPv6-PD is available, but the stub router
    > doesn’t get the desired prefix length or encounters some error in the
    > process?

What are the situations where a SNAC Stub Router would more address space than a
single /64?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email