SNANAU WG consensus on draft-ietf-snanau-hprmib-02.txt
"R.E. (Robert) Moore (254-4436)" <REMOORE@ralvm6.vnet.ibm.com> Wed, 28 May 1997 12:50 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa07067; 28 May 97 8:50 EDT
Received: from fontina.Cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05697; 28 May 97 8:50 EDT
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (mailgate-sj-1.cisco.com [198.92.30.31]) by fontina.cisco.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA19359 for <extdom.snanaumib@aliashost.cisco.com>; Wed, 28 May 1997 05:44:49 -0700
Received: from VNET.IBM.COM (vnet.ibm.com [204.146.168.194]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.8.4-Cisco.1/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id FAA06508 for <snanaumib@external.cisco.com>; Wed, 28 May 1997 05:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705281244.FAA06508@hubbub.cisco.com>
Received: from RALVM6 by VNET.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 7047; Wed, 28 May 97 08:44:44 EDT
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 08:30:11 -0400
From: "R.E. (Robert) Moore (254-4436)" <REMOORE@ralvm6.vnet.ibm.com>
To: jhalpern@newbridge.com, scoya@ietf.org
cc: snanaumib@external.cisco.com
Subject: SNANAU WG consensus on draft-ietf-snanau-hprmib-02.txt
First, thanks for your help with progression of the APPN MIB. Now that it's been approved as a Proposed Standard, is there anything more that I need to do, or do the WG and I just sit back and let it move up through the RFC editor's queue? As I predicted last week, the HPR MIB now joins the DLUR MIB with SNANAU WG consensus for progression to Proposed Standard. Since I don't quite remember when in the process I submitted them before, I've attached below the text for you to use when the DLUR and HPR MIBs get their IESG approval for Proposed Standard status. I wasn't sure whether to describe Randy as a Routing Area reviewer, or as a reviewer for some sort of virtual NM Area associated with the NM Area Advisory Team, which, I believe, was supposed to continue in existence after the demise of the NM Area itself. Feel free to make these parts of the announcements say what they should. Thanks, Bob Moore SNANAU WG chair >>>> DLUR MIB text: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "Definitions of Managed Objects for DLUR" <draft-ietf-snanau-dlurmib-02.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This document is the joint product of the SNA NAU Services MIB (snanau) Working Group and the APPN MIBs Special Interest Group of the APPN Implementers Workshop. The IESG contact person is Joel Halpern. Technical Summary This specification defines an extension to the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with SNMP-based network management. In particular, it defines objects for monitoring network devices with Advanced Peer-to-Peer Networking Dependent LU Requester (APPN DLUR) capabilities. This memo specifies a MIB module in a manner that is both compliant to the SNMPv2 SMI, and semantically identical to the SNMPv1 definitions. Working Group Summary This document reflects the consensus of the working group. There were no issues raised during the last call. Protocol Quality This MIB was reviewed by Randy Presuhn for the IETF Routing Area, and by Joel Halpern for the IESG. >>>> HPR MIB text: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "Definitions of Managed Objects for HPR" <draft-ietf-snanau-hprmib-02.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This document is the joint product of the SNA NAU Services MIB (snanau) Working Group and the APPN MIBs Special Interest Group of the APPN Implementers Workshop. The IESG contact person is Joel Halpern. Technical Summary This specification defines an extension to the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with SNMP-based network management. In particular, it defines objects for monitoring and controlling network devices with Advanced Peer-to-Peer Networking High-Performance Routing (APPN/HPR) capabilities. This memo specifies a MIB module in a manner that is both compliant to the SNMPv2 SMI, and semantically identical to the SNMPv1 definitions. Working Group Summary This document reflects the consensus of the working group. There were no issues raised during the last call. Protocol Quality This MIB was reviewed by Randy Presuhn for the IETF Routing Area, and by Joel Halpern for the IESG.
- SNANAU WG consensus on draft-ietf-snanau-hprmib-0… R.E. (Robert) Moore (254-4436)