Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?

[Bob Stewart <[e-mail]>]

Cross posting with a vengence.  I didn't remove Ed's individual address, so he
should get 4 copies.  Muahahahahahahahaha.

Er, ahem.  Hmmm.  I'll get 4, too, counting my BCC.  Oh, well.

>Then why not, after similar action with regards to SNMP 
>Security, merge all 3 lists together?

Merging SNMP and SNMP Security is not my call.  I understand they were made
separate so the security stuff could be in the Security Area, carefully
watched over by the spooks, er, security people.  :-)}

It would take IESG action to decide that all SNMP is generally represented by
one big happy mailing list, with separate mailing lists for separate working
groups.  Actually, as I type this, I realize that if the Secure SNMP Working
Group goes away in the near future, as the SNMPv2 Working Group should, it's
mailing list would become defunct, too, and all we'd have is the general SNMP
list to flame in.  I suppose there's something to be said for collapsing to a
single mailing list when the work is "done," and assuming we'll create new
working groups, with new mailing lists, in the proper areas if we need to to
move SNMPv2 from Proposed to Draft.

	Bob