IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus coming?

Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com> Fri, 29 January 1993 14:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02855; 29 Jan 93 9:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02850; 29 Jan 93 9:38 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10583; 29 Jan 93 9:41 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA29326> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 29 Jan 93 09:41:16 EST
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA29322> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Fri, 29 Jan 93 09:41:13 EST
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA04470@xap.xyplex.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 93 12:43:40 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 93 12:43:40 -0500
Message-Id: <9301291743.AA04470@xap.xyplex.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
To: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp@psi.com
In-Reply-To: Cheryl Krupczak's message of Thu, 28 Jan 93 14:23:29 EST <9301281923.AA15894@terminus.cc.gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus coming?

Cheryl made some very good points.  In my zeal to get the work done, I haven't
been as aware or active as I could have been to avoid the appearance of
favoritism.  I'll try to do that better.

	Bob

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email