Re: snmpv2 pros and cons
lyle <lyle@hpindda.cup.hp.com> Tue, 12 October 1993 18:26 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13770;
12 Oct 93 14:26 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13760;
12 Oct 93 14:26 EDT
Received: from JArthur.CS.HMC.Edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15702;
12 Oct 93 14:26 EDT
Received: from jarthur by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id ab12255; 12 Oct 93 9:44 PDT
Received: from lists.psi.com by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id aa10704;
12 Oct 93 9:12 PDT
Received: by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA24560; Tue, 12 Oct 93 11:59:39 EDT
Return-Path: <lyle@hpindda.cup.hp.com>
Received: from psi.com by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA24524; Tue, 12 Oct 93 11:59:17 EDT
Received: from relay.hp.com by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet)
id AA05497; Tue, 12 Oct 93 11:59:19 EDT
Received: from hpindda.cup.hp.com by relay.hp.com with SMTP
(16.6/15.5+IOS 3.13) id AA00533; Tue, 12 Oct 93 08:59:18 -0700
Received: by hpindda.cup.hp.com
(15.11/15.5+IOS 3.20+cup+OMrelay) id AA21893; Tue, 12 Oct 93 08:59:12 pdt
Message-Id: <9310121559.AA21893@hpindda.cup.hp.com>
Subject: Re: snmpv2 pros and cons
To: Bill Norton <wbn@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 8:59:10 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: lyle <lyle@hpindda.cup.hp.com>
Cc: snmp@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <9310112230.AA11644@merit.edu>;
from "Bill Norton" at Oct 11, 93 6:30 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 64.9]
>Any V2 developers / deployers care to >contribute their experiences to the group? I'm not a V2 developer/deployer (and don't play one on TV), but ... A year ago September, interoperability testing among RMON implementors (agents & mgmt stn) was held in Anaheim, California. Everybody who went seemed to think the effort well worth the time and effort. Something similar could, imho, focus concerns on real problems, rather than on speculation, and be very easy to resolve, as was the case then. --lyle weiman #include <std.disclaimers> PS: volunteers-to-host from plush resort spots around the world are encouraged. ;) ;)
- Re: snmpv2 pros and cons Bill Norton
- Re: snmpv2 pros and cons lyle
- Re: snmpv2 pros and cons Bob Natale