Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow

Aleksey Y Romanov <ralex@world.std.com> Mon, 11 October 1993 23:34 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29407; 11 Oct 93 19:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29403; 11 Oct 93 19:34 EDT
Received: from JArthur.CS.HMC.Edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10304; 11 Oct 93 19:34 EDT
Received: from jarthur by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id ab13163; 11 Oct 93 15:54 PDT
Received: from lists.psi.com by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id aa08596; 11 Oct 93 14:29 PDT
Received: by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI) id AA13767; Mon, 11 Oct 93 17:17:34 EDT
Return-Path: <ralex@world.std.com>
Received: from psi.com by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI) id AA13731; Mon, 11 Oct 93 17:17:22 EDT
Received: from world.std.com by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet) id AA12478; Mon, 11 Oct 93 17:18:01 EDT
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA00730; Mon, 11 Oct 1993 17:16:48 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Aleksey Y Romanov <ralex@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <199310112116.AA00730@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow
To: snmp@psi.com
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1993 17:16:48 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199310112114.AA00316@world.std.com> from "Aleksey Y Romanov" at Oct 11, 93 05:14:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 386

 
> There are also parts which do not represent a problem, but which 
> can be substantially improved:
> 
> 1. Parties
> 2. Instance level granularity
> 3. The 128-oid limit 

OOPS, forgot #4. Authentication protocol is subject to export
restrictions while there are similar protocols which are not subject
to export restrictions. Why not to allow one of them as an option ?

Aleksey