IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?

Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com> Thu, 11 February 1993 22:27 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17575; 11 Feb 93 17:27 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17570; 11 Feb 93 17:27 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28815; 11 Feb 93 17:28 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA13911> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Thu, 11 Feb 93 17:28:25 EST
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA13907> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Thu, 11 Feb 93 17:28:22 EST
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA29895@xap.xyplex.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 93 20:29:07 -0500
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 93 20:29:07 -0500
Message-Id: <9302120129.AA29895@xap.xyplex.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
To: snmp@uu.psi.com
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Marshall Rose's message of Thu, 11 Feb 1993 14:12:23 -0800 <5305.729468743@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List? 

>I really do not want non-WG traffic on a WG's mailing list.  Let's give
>people the benefit of the doubt and try to train them to use the right
>list for the right reason...

Although Frank has a point, I have to agree with Marshall.  Having a
distinction between general discussion and a working group allows you to
neglect one list when you don't have time, and gives the chair a place to
direct discussion that is relevant to the larger topic but not to the work at
hand.

While work was in progress on SNMPv2, the SNMP list continued to have SNMPv1
questions and discussions that would have intruded on SNMPv2.

	Bob

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email