Re: How about moving this discussion ...?
Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com> Tue, 09 February 1993 16:44 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03886;
9 Feb 93 11:44 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03882;
9 Feb 93 11:44 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10674;
9 Feb 93 11:44 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA00783> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Tue, 9 Feb 93 11:43:48 EST
Received: from eco.twg.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA00739> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2;
Tue, 9 Feb 93 11:43:24 EST
Received: from LOCAL.eco.twg.com by eco.twg.com (5.67/ECO.m-$Revision: 2.16 $)
id AA18949; Tue, 9 Feb 93 11:43:03 -0500
Message-Id: <9302091643.AA18949@eco.twg.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1993 08:42:12 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com>
Subject: Re: How about moving this discussion ...?
To: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Cc: snmp@psi.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
>Please move these sort of discussions to snmp mailing list. > >Thanks, > >---- >mlk@bir.comcom, mlk@bir.uucp, or bir!mlk (Michael L. Kornegay) OK, once again, how about us merging the two SNMP mail groups? 1) If the SNMPv2 work is "almost complete", then it is SNMP, for discussion purposes at least; 2) There is obvious confusion as to which mail group to post to; 3) I am tired of double postings! We have/are evolving the protocol, not creating a new one. The SNMPv2 mail list has served its purpose(!?) In fact, maybe it's time we threw in the SNMP security mail list too for good measure. Seriously, it just seems to make sense to me. All in favor, say AYE! Flamethrowers not required;-) Regards, Ed Alcoff
- Re: How about moving this discussion ...? Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg
- Re: How about moving this discussion ...? Pete Grillo