Re: Didn't I Start This? (Was: Autotopology)

Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com> Wed, 14 April 1993 17:18 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28134; 14 Apr 93 13:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28130; 14 Apr 93 13:18 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17066; 14 Apr 93 13:18 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA07413> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Wed, 14 Apr 93 13:18:38 EDT
Received: from eco.twg.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA07375> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Wed, 14 Apr 93 13:18:27 EDT
Received: from LOCAL.eco.twg.com by eco.twg.com (5.67/ECO.m-$Revision: 2.16 $) id AA02586; Wed, 14 Apr 93 13:17:44 -0400
Message-Id: <9304141717.AA02586@eco.twg.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1993 10:09:38 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com>
Subject: Re: Didn't I Start This? (Was: Autotopology)
To: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
Cc: snmp@psi.com, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com

>Let's not cross post the autotopology discussion to SNMPv2.  This is a quiet,
>sleep working group mailing list, resting after a hard workout.
>
>	Bob

Bob,

I appreciate the work that you as chair and the other members
of the SNMPv2 work group has accomplished (and are to be
congratulated). However, I believe this discussion should
remain cross-posted because it seems that SNMPv2, as defined,
will break most existing discovery/autotopology mechanisms.

This might help to underscore my point about merging the
two lists.  I too, am tired of the cross-posting.

Ed

P.S. - Sorry for the delayed reply, but I have been out
of the office for the last few days and have been suffering
from e-mail withdrawl;-)