Re: SNMPv2's properties
Aleksey Y Romanov <ralex@world.std.com> Wed, 13 October 1993 04:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00564;
13 Oct 93 0:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00559;
13 Oct 93 0:32 EDT
Received: from JArthur.CS.HMC.Edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00455;
13 Oct 93 0:32 EDT
Received: from jarthur by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id bb16283; 12 Oct 93 17:05 PDT
Received: from lists.psi.com by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id aa15350;
12 Oct 93 16:42 PDT
Received: by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA02012; Tue, 12 Oct 93 19:26:23 EDT
Return-Path: <ralex@world.std.com>
Received: from psi.com by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA01976; Tue, 12 Oct 93 19:26:09 EDT
Received: from world.std.com by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet)
id AA15946; Tue, 12 Oct 93 19:26:52 EDT
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
id AA14291; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 19:25:33 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Aleksey Y Romanov <ralex@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <199310122325.AA14291@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: SNMPv2's properties
To: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1993 19:25:32 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: snmp@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <9310122232.AA20541@xap.xyplex.com> from "Bob Stewart" at Oct 12,
93 05:32:48 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 823
> > >- An ability to work with several management stations in a controlled manner. > > Check. SNMPv1 and SNMPv2 both have that via MIB objects in the right places. > SNMPv2 includes some standardized objects to help. It seems to me that the following better describing the situation with SNMPv2 in this area: 1. NMS-to-NMS collisions are out of scope of SNMPv2, it is a responsibility of NMSs to insure collisonless operations 2. The intention of snmpSetSerialNo is to facilitate such kind of operations. This object requires some additional work to be done. > >These are significant issues and they could be at least as > >important as notions like security. Does v2 address them? > > True. Yes. Reliable multi-NMS access never was (and is) considered as a serious issue in SNMPv2 framework. > Bob
- SNMPv2's properties MARTIN USHER
- Re: SNMPv2's properties Bob Stewart
- SNMPv1 and Reverse Poll (managed ->manager) Mike MacFaden
- Re: SNMPv1 and Reverse Poll (managed ->manager) karl
- Re: SNMPv2's properties Aleksey Y Romanov