Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow
MARTIN USHER <musher@ccrelay.fibermux.com> Mon, 11 October 1993 17:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24138;
11 Oct 93 13:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24134;
11 Oct 93 13:32 EDT
Received: from JArthur.CS.HMC.Edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00582;
11 Oct 93 13:32 EDT
Received: from jarthur by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id aa21242; 11 Oct 93 10:12 PDT
Received: from lists.psi.com by jarthur.Claremont.EDU id aa21036;
11 Oct 93 10:06 PDT
Received: by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA09430; Mon, 11 Oct 93 12:54:06 EDT
Return-Path: <fibermux!ccrelay.fibermux.com!musher@uu.psi.com>
Received: from psi.com by lists.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2-PSI)
id AA09394; Mon, 11 Oct 93 12:53:52 EDT
Received: from uu.psi.com by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet)
id AA07202; Mon, 11 Oct 93 12:54:34 EDT
Received: from fibermux.UUCP by uu.psi.com (5.65b/4.1.031792-PSI/PSINet) via
UUCP; id AA16722 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 93 12:36:03 -0400
Received: from ccrelay.fibermux.com by fibermux.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA11447; Mon, 11 Oct 93 08:46:06 PDT
Received: from cc:Mail by ccrelay.fibermux.com (1.20/SMTPLink)
id A11124; Mon, 11 Oct 93 08:44:38 PST
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 93 08:44:38 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: MARTIN USHER <musher@ccrelay.fibermux.com>
Message-Id: <9310110844.A11124@ccrelay.fibermux.com>
To: karl@mel-brooks.tgv.com, feit@tigger.jvnc.net
Cc: snmp@psi.com
Subject: Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow
Speaking as an observer.... 1) It is very easy for people who are 'in' to things to think that everyone else has the same level of commitment and interest. They can end up designing somthing that may be very elegant and comprehensive but is totally unusable by end users. SNMP achieved acceptance because it was 'simple' - to implement, to use and to diagnose. What we are looking at with v2 is somthing that - while it addresses shortcomings in v1 - requires drastic increases in storage, processing power and developer time. This does not bode well. 2) I'm inherently suspicous of draft standards that are proposed by people who may have a pecunary interest in their being adopted.
- snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Ms. Sydney Feit
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow karl
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow MARTIN USHER
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow John Seligson
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Bill Norton
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Aleksey Y Romanov
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow karl
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow karl
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Aleksey Y Romanov
- Re: snmpv2 pros and cons Lee D. Rothstein
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Frank Kastenholz
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow karl
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Robert D. Graham
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow Frank Kastenholz
- Re: snmpv2 Will it flood us or be slow David Perkins