Re: A non response to: Re: RFCs to Histrionic status (fwd)

[Marshall Rose (via RadioMail) <[e-mail]>]

> Given the mass of new material, I found it odd that on the same day
> that the RFCs were announced, that the working groups were deemed to
> have completed their charters and summarily dissolved, leaving no
> effective focus for continued SNMPv2 discussions.

karl - i don't understand your comment.  working groups exist until they fulfill
their charter; mailing lists continue.  the snmpV2 wg completed it's charter,
as did the snmp sec wg.  when snmpV2 comes up for standards track review,
a new charter re-activating the wg will be prepared.  the snmp sec wg will be
folded into the snmpV2 wg.

for now, the snmpV2 mailing list exists as a forum for discussing experiences, as well as a forum for pointless messages of little or no redeeming value.

/mtr