Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus coming?
Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Thu, 28 January 1993 19:54 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10083;
28 Jan 93 14:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10079;
28 Jan 93 14:54 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23659;
28 Jan 93 14:56 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA09979> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Thu, 28 Jan 93 14:56:43 EST
Received: from saffron.acc.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA09973> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2;
Thu, 28 Jan 93 14:56:41 EST
Received: by saffron.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA01645; Thu, 28 Jan 93 11:56:19 PST
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 11:56:19 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Message-Id: <9301281956.AA01645@saffron.acc.com>
To: cheryl@cc.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus coming?
Cc: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp@psi.com
Thanks, Cheryl.
- Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus comi… Michael L. Kornegay
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … Marshall Rose
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … Bob Stewart
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … James R. (Chuck) Davin
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … Cheryl Krupczak
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … Fred Baker
- Re: Squashing important ideas (was Re: consensus … Bob Stewart