Party row destruction.
F.Goncalves@cs.ucl.ac.uk Fri, 13 August 1993 14:43 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05165;
13 Aug 93 10:43 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05161;
13 Aug 93 10:43 EDT
Received: from SLEEPY.TIS.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12450;
13 Aug 93 10:43 EDT
Received: from sleepy.tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id ab01326; 13 Aug 93 14:23 GMT
Received: from tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa01324; 13 Aug 93 10:17 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64)
id AA16171; Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:17:17 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7)
id <AA16308> for snmpv2@tis.com; Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:17:13 EDT
Message-Id: <9308131417.AA16308@thumper.bellcore.com>
Received: from carnival.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.13811-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 13 Aug 1993 15:16:36 +0100
To: snmp@psi.com
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Party row destruction.
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 15:16:36 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: F.Goncalves@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Lets suppose that a set request is sent with "a" and "b" as source and destination parties and it delets the entry of the party table descriving "a" (or "b"). After doing the operation, should the response be sent? Any help appreciated. Fernando ---------- email: fernando@cs.ucl.ac.uk
- Party row destruction. F.Goncalves
- Re: Party row destruction. Keith McCloghrie