[James M Galvin: Final Call for Consensus]

James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com> Fri, 12 March 1993 14:21 UTC

Message-Id: <9303121406.AA29005@TIS.COM>
Reply-To: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
To: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Subject: [James M Galvin: Final Call for Consensus]
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 09:06:55 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>

This is a reminder that today is the last day for comments.  The latest
drafts of the documents will be forwarded to the IESG for consideration
as proposed standards after today.

To date, I have received no comments.

Thanks,

Jim

------- Forwarded Message

Reply-To:   James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
From:       James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
To:         snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Date:       Fri, 05 Mar 93 13:37:39 -0500
Subject:    Final Call for Consensus

Bob Stewart, Keith, and I have agreed to issue our final consensus
calls.  We're doing it in parallel with the IESG's examination of the
documents and process inquiry which are already in process, assuming
that will all come out OK.

Throughout the month of February, there was only one (minor) outstanding
issue, and that was on the availableSubtreeTable.  In view of the
(modest) comments received, I am directing the editor to remove this
table from the Party MIB.  If future implementation experience dictates,
the table can be added at a later date.

I am directing the editor to produce final (non-changebar) versions of
our drafts.  Unless significant objections with widespread support are
raised, these drafts will be forwarded to the IESG as the output of this
WG.

The deadline for comments will be Friday, March 12.  Thanks for all your
work and patience.

Jim

------- End of Forwarded Message

[James M Galvin: Final Call for Consensus] James M Galvin