Re: correct x400ops minutes will be in proceedings
Einar Stefferud <Stef=x400@nma.com> Wed, 21 April 1993 20:08 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13056; 21 Apr 93 16:08 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13052; 21 Apr 93 16:08 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28356; 21 Apr 93 16:08 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <11042-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Wed, 21 Apr 1993 15:06:41 +0000
Received: from ics.uci.edu by cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 21 Apr 93 15:06:32 -0500
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ab19350; 21 Apr 93 13:01 PDT
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa29131; 21 Apr 93 12:55 PDT
To: Allan Cargille <Allan.Cargille@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: correct x400ops minutes will be in proceedings
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Apr 1993 11:03:19 -0000." <930421110306*/G=Allan/S=Cargille/OU=cs/O=uw-madison/PRMD=xnren/C=us/@MHS>
Reply-To: Stef=x400@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef=x400@nma.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 12:55:08 -0700
Message-Id: <29129.735422108@odin.nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com
It seems clear to me tht the IETF Proceedings are really more like a collection of WG/BOF Reports, than WG/BOF Minutes of Record. So, in the EMailMgt BOF case, I simply provided a Report of the BOF, and the Minutes of Record are something else, with more detail for internal use of EMailMgt. We are not confused by calling the IETF Proceedings Report "Minutes". I suggest a similar approach for other WG/BOF "reports" to be included in the IETF Proceedings. Best...\Stef
- Re: correct x400ops minutes will be in proceedings Einar Stefferud