Re: Protocol Action: SNMP Version 2 and SNMP Security to Proposed Standard

Bill Norton <wbn@merit.edu> Fri, 02 April 1993 23:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06382; 2 Apr 93 18:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06378; 2 Apr 93 18:52 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02182; 2 Apr 93 18:52 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06359; 2 Apr 93 18:52 EST
Received: from merit.edu by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06353; 2 Apr 93 18:52 EST
Return-Path: <wbn@merit.edu>
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA09247; Fri, 2 Apr 93 18:52:31 -0500
Message-Id: <9304022352.AA09247@merit.edu>
To: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: karl@empirical.com, iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, postel@isi.edu, iab@isi.edu, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com, IESG@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: SNMP Version 2 and SNMP Security to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Apr 93 11:51:28 EST." <9304021151.aa03555@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 93 18:52:31 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bill Norton <wbn@merit.edu>

Actually,  I'd be curious to hear the answer to these questions.
Besides the four implementations from the authors, are there any others
that have proven interoperability? 

Were these "complete" implementations ( all security stuff, bulk
retrievals, etc.? )

Who in the IESG reviewed the specs?  

  
Bill


  >Subject: Re: Protocol Action: SNMP Version 2 and SNMP Security
  >    to Proposed Standard 
  >In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Apr 93 07:49:57 PST."
  >             <9304021549.AA07045@mel-brooks.empirical.com> 
  >Date: Fri, 02 Apr 93 11:51:28 -0500
  >From: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >Karl,
  >
  >>*>    (Who has reviewed the spec for the IESG? Are there implementations?)
  >
  >Please forgive my Friday morning at IETF goof.  This is a line I neglected
  >to delete from the boilerplate recommendation.  This line is intended
  >to be be an to aid to the IESG Area Director in the preparation of a
  >protocol action report and has no relation to the SNMPv2 or SNMP Security
  >protocols.
  >
  >Greg Vaudreuil