Final Call for Consensus

James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com> Fri, 05 March 1993 19:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15113; 5 Mar 93 14:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15109; 5 Mar 93 14:50 EST
Received: from SLEEPY.TIS.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19447; 5 Mar 93 14:50 EST
Received: from sleepy.tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id ab00501; 5 Mar 93 18:41 GMT
Received: from tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa00499; 5 Mar 93 13:37 EST
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA16945; Fri, 5 Mar 93 13:37:40 EST
Message-Id: <9303051837.AA16945@TIS.COM>
Reply-To: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
To: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Subject: Final Call for Consensus
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1993 13:37:39 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>

Bob Stewart, Keith, and I have agreed to issue our final consensus
calls.  We're doing it in parallel with the IESG's examination of the
documents and process inquiry which are already in process, assuming
that will all come out OK.

Throughout the month of February, there was only one (minor) outstanding
issue, and that was on the availableSubtreeTable.  In view of the
(modest) comments received, I am directing the editor to remove this
table from the Party MIB.  If future implementation experience dictates,
the table can be added at a later date.

I am directing the editor to produce final (non-changebar) versions of
our drafts.  Unless significant objections with widespread support are
raised, these drafts will be forwarded to the IESG as the output of this
WG.

The deadline for comments will be Friday, March 12.  Thanks for all your
work and patience.

Jim