Re: Protocol Action: SNMP Version 2 and SNMP Security to Proposed Standard

Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 02 April 1993 16:51 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03585; 2 Apr 93 11:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03578; 2 Apr 93 11:51 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13416; 2 Apr 93 11:51 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03561; 2 Apr 93 11:51 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03555; 2 Apr 93 11:51 EST
To: karl@empirical.com
cc: iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, postel@isi.edu, iab@isi.edu, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com, IESG@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: SNMP Version 2 and SNMP Security to Proposed Standard
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Apr 93 07:49:57 PST." <9304021549.AA07045@mel-brooks.empirical.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 93 11:51:28 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9304021151.aa03555@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Karl,

>*>    (Who has reviewed the spec for the IESG? Are there implementations?)

Please forgive my Friday morning at IETF goof.  This is a line I neglected
to delete from the boilerplate recommendation.  This line is intended
to be be an to aid to the IESG Area Director in the preparation of a
protocol action report and has no relation to the SNMPv2 or SNMP Security
protocols.

Greg Vaudreuil