Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?

Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Thu, 11 February 1993 21:26 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16460; 11 Feb 93 16:26 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16456; 11 Feb 93 16:26 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25962; 11 Feb 93 16:26 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06794> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Thu, 11 Feb 93 16:26:38 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06787> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Thu, 11 Feb 93 16:26:34 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690) id AA04392; Thu, 11 Feb 93 13:24:14 -0800
To: Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com>
Cc: snmp@psi.com, snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Reply-To: snmp@uu.psi.com
Subject: Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Feb 1993 13:00:02 PST." <9302112059.AA05629@eco.twg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 13:24:09 -0800
Message-Id: <4387.729465849@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>

The Security Area Director, Steve Crocker is on travel for the next
couple of days.  However, after the current situation is resolved,
he is thinking about merging the SNMP Security working group into the
SNMPv2 working group.

This sounds fine to me.

For myself, I think it important to have a discussion list *and* a
working group list.  The working group list should be focused on
advancing the documents through the process.  The discussion list can be
for FAQs, etc.  There is something of a difference between the two, eh?

/mtr