RE: Table idices
David Perkins <dperkins@scruznet.com> Thu, 27 March 1997 20:37 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa08207; 27 Mar 97 15:37 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20098; 27 Mar 97 15:37 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id PAA00829 for snmpv2-outgoing; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 15:25:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 12:28:01 -0800
From: David Perkins <dperkins@scruznet.com>
Subject: RE: Table idices
To: SNMPv2 List <snmpv2@tis.com>, SNMP List <snmp@lists.psi.com>, John Leonard <jleonard@mail1.wireless.tellabs.com>
X-Mailer: Chameleon V0.05, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc.
Message-ID: <Chameleon.970327123525.dperkins@dperkins4.sj.scruznet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: owner-snmpv2@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
John, On your question below... On Thu, 27 Mar 1997 13:01:18 -0500 John Leonard wrote: >Hi All, > >Is there any SNMP or SNMPv2 RFC that comes out and states that INTEGER >table indices can't take the value 0? I know that there is a *very* strong >convention that they not use 0, but is this actually forbidden? > There is no such rule that states that the value of zero cannot be used. Also see page 106, and background pages 24-27, and 100-109 in "Understanding SNMP MIBs" by Perkins and McGinnis. Regards, /dperkins@scruznet.com, David T. Perkins Date: 03/27/97, Time: 12:28:02
- Table idices John Leonard
- Re: Table idices Keith McCloghrie
- Re: Table idices Randy Presuhn
- Re: Table idices Bob Stewart
- RE: Table idices David Perkins
- Re: Table idices John Leonard