Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2013 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA7E21F8F39 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwN+sXmIVwHU for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x235.google.com (mail-ia0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6899D21F8A52 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f181.google.com with SMTP id o25so6241465iad.12 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=daXkEdluJdOTpoW78e3fIw+2Mr7t5n69IFEWI79tGM8=; b=g0ojHOzsUb8mhcYsvLTznxNMY7QRflJ+vQsxjVSMonhI8cV8kWKSAgyiWKUW9MCXFe SJGImY4FkR0Qi1x2V8L4GkHSlj3QqH79AtVIJqFQFlhkyu628hSuv3VGMoQ1mE4vhNWN gY54O8HfDhVR1HLALg4NlzR1PTqOYBQfuuKuF0xGEy/kO9FR7LpztTl8qL8MEwO648mc D5IVF0cxYXP00sS5nfLmi8Qnu3/4DMahrm3nGteamSR+qvp2wSW4vK1U90Su0y278iz8 Y6zrR0hWzchpL3iedfh7r7XLxyalfHrC1mlTPx8l4udysGUBooaQFYsATiabExzHasW4 Bpsw==
X-Received: by 10.50.6.202 with SMTP id d10mr9803522iga.28.1365507013995; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-173-206-2-115.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.2.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wx2sm24593142igb.4.2013.04.09.04.30.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5163FBC3.3040602@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:30:11 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <51633480.8070209@gmail.com> <28533DEA-0DD3-43DD-9CA4-929B0DBA9BDD@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <28533DEA-0DD3-43DD-9CA4-929B0DBA9BDD@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130409-0, 09/04/2013), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:30:15 -0000

OK, how about this for the complete paragraph:

    "By default, the MAP subnetwork identifier is the first subnetwork 
within the End-user IPv6 prefix (all bits set to zero). An alternative 
subnetwork value MAY be configured. All nodes within a MAP domain MUST 
be configured to use the same value of the subnetwork identifier."

I think that captures the intent. However, I see a possible difficulty: 
differing lengths of the End-user IPv6 prefix for different CEs. We have 
to add two conditions:

  -- the configured subnetwork identifier is at least
             64 - min (n + o)
bits long, where the minimization is taken over all FMRs in the domain

  -- the subnetwork identifier used with a given calculated End-user 
IPv6 prefix uses the right-most (64 - (n + o)) bits of the configured 
subnetwork identifier, where (n + o) is taken from the FMR used for the 
calculation.

Seems simpler just to restrict to the all-zeros value, but please comment.

Tom

On 09/04/2013 6:51 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Tom,
>
>> In Section 5.2 of -map-05, there is the paragraph:
>>
>> The MAP subnet ID is defined to be the first subnet (all bits set to
>>    zero).  Unless configured differently, a MAP node MUST reserve the
>>    first IPv6 prefix in an End-user IPv6 prefix for the purpose of MAP.
>>
>> Question: does the second sentence say anything different from the first one?
>>
>> Question: if the MAP node is configured differently, how will other nodes be able to synthesize its MAP IPv6 address from the FMR?
>
> all nodes within the domain must use the same subnet-id. perhaps we could make that clearer.
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>