[Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7598 (4865)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 15 November 2016 08:44 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE9E12973A for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:44:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6hmbelaZyjq for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707FD1296C9 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 430C4B801E0; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:44:09 -0800 (PST)
To: tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, ot@cisco.com, ian.farrer@telekom.de, sperreault@jive.com, wdec@cisco.com, congxiao@cernet.edu.cn, leaf.y.yeh@hotmail.com, dxhbupt@gmail.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ianfarrer@gmx.com, cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161115084409.430C4B801E0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:44:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/2PuvfEz2U2htYEwKZFZqoYO_a98>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:50:34 -0800
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7598 (4865)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:44:11 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7598, "DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7598&eid=4865 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ian Farrer <ian.farrer@telekom.de> Section: 4.3 Original Text ------------- dmr-prefix6-len: 8 bits long; expresses the bitmask length of the IPv6 prefix specified in the dmr-ipv6-prefix field. Allowed values range from 0 to 128. Corrected Text -------------- dmr-prefix6-len: 8 bits long; expresses the bitmask length of the IPv6 prefix specified in the dmr-ipv6-prefix field. Allowed values range from 0 to 96. Notes ----- This field is used to provision the default mapping rule prefix length, which is defined in section 5.1 of RFC7599: The DMR IPv6 prefix length SHOULD be 64 bits long by default and in any case MUST NOT exceed 96 bits. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7598 (draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-12) -------------------------------------- Title : DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients Publication Date : July 2015 Author(s) : T. Mrugalski, O. Troan, I. Farrer, S. Perreault, W. Dec, C. Bao, L. Yeh, X. Deng Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Softwires Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7598 (… RFC Errata System