IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [softwire]One of the remaining issues in the softwire multicast.

Shu Yang <yangshu1988@gmail.com> Wed, 03 September 2014 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <yangshu1988@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D6C1A0154 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1X0Jxm2K26u for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B191A005F for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u56so8897942wes.36 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pF3en/BTIbam8ZBwvVa2hC2nM32E5ZLPzOCcpFROvvU=; b=Zqsxvol8kRBmi/Wkn2vAtrUXS/AmpUV/Q6Hcay7FoAGuDaEQntYPgSocRfbcSVXHo2 LYTWRorY2CCmAE1oLRer5r9UcOMSxpcqIVPxKNnbzAxWyjrrTAoJG9NxCCVm9/jp9B7m ZVymtcUB+pNnqePdjkWMYvYPJx+C9CtCh0BWu0k6cm2UzH8psAXHaQL1/ruuCaqXJgeH nnrY9xNZY/+kxzAtNfFB7b47fmB+9msXEOwQoBZKBtec+d90bWhMw1h4E0vuxUjOnDbZ q+YT1FUTTyMqH2jQthL1GctjzWU277QTcqQhD1WKWBbrfEVjdfMtY+jQ62JiyYxMYFHd dBHA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.100 with SMTP id a4mr4944492wjx.106.1409763519249; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.162.69 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF8D565B28.B6BD785C-ON48257D47.00228B80-48257D47.0034FA84@zte.com.cn>
References: <DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F7F447C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <OF8D565B28.B6BD785C-ON48257D47.00228B80-48257D47.0034FA84@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:58:39 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL6OX+06sVSmkvOEYE5xr3fMgQArTn=BrkYKJ6B8G6q4KrB9aQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shu Yang <yangshu1988@gmail.com>
To: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bfd0582c8546d05022c2547"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/2URSg8mhBhkLW28uLnPP_JdjXd4
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire]One of the remaining issues in the softwire multicast.
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:58:42 -0000

Yes, we also want to advance the accompanying documents to help the primary
technology
be implemented flawlessly. We have a multicast draft,
draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-07,
that
can support Internet-style multicast across a set of external IP and
internal IP networks supporting
softwire mesh.

Shu Yang


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:37 PM, <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn> wrote:

>
> Hi Softwirers，
>     There are some softwire technologies already in the WG, and generally,
> there also need some accompanying documents to help the primary technology
> be implemented flawlessly.
>     So far, there are some primary documents, DHCP Option documents and
> RADIUS Option documents shown as below.
>     As can be seen from the chart, softwire-multicast series is not
> complete.
> These documents all had been adopted as WG doc or became RFCs *except
> draft-*
> *hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-05*.
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | primary documents   |    DHCP Option         |    RADIUS Option       |
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> |    RFC 6333         |     RFC 6334           |    RFC 6519            |
> |(draft-ietf-softwire | (draft-ietf-softwire-  |  (draft-ietf-softwire- |
> | -dual-stack-lite)   | ds-lite-tunnel-option) |  dslite-radius-ext)    |
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   |  draft-ietf-softwire   |
> | -map                |  map-dhcp              |   -map-radius          |
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> |    RFC 5969         | RFC 5969  section 7.1.1|   RFC 6930             |
> |(draft-ietf-softwire |                        |  (draft-ietf-softwire- |
> | -ipv6-6rd)          |                        |   6rd-radius-attrib)   |
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> ...............
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   | * draft-hu-softwire-* |
> | -dslite-multicast & | multicast-prefix-option| *multicast-radius-ext*|
> | draft-ietf-softwire |                        |                        |
> | -mesh-multicast     |                        |                        |
> +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+
>
>     draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option &
> draft-hu-softwire-multicast-
> radius-ext are companion documents. The former provides a method to carry
> "IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes" as a DHCPv6 option.
> Likewise
> draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext provides a RADIUS option to carry
> the
> above attributes.
>
>     Is there anyone intereted in this topic? Any comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Wei
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email