Re: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16: (with COMMENT)
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 16:08 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523791294E4; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 08:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1e-lr1yFknJ2; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 08:08:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta239.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E830F1294D3; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 08:08:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) by opfedar21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5A0F9100A83; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:08:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.57]) by opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 38B3A40068; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:08:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::787e:db0c:23c4:71b3%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:08:53 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSfKRHul5t4nG3ZkCtu2z9UCZgo6FUT+Mw
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:08:53 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009DEBCFD@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <148596480917.19292.3223309102693165640.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148596480917.19292.3223309102693165640.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/49jFaaad_qjNkA0mahQsBdMGZWM>
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, "softwire-chairs@ietf.org" <softwire-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:08:58 -0000
Hi Mirja, Thank you for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Mirja > Kuehlewind > Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2017 17:00 > À : The IESG > Cc : softwires@ietf.org; softwire-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-softwire- > dslite-multicast@ietf.org > Objet : [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire- > dslite-multicast-16: (with COMMENT) > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - Please spell out DR at its first occurrence > [Med] Will do. > - Not sure I understand what the intention of the following section is: > "6.4. Host Built-in mB4 Function > > If the mB4 function is implemented in the host which is directly > connected to an IPv6-only network, the host MUST implement the > behaviors specified in Sections 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3. The host MAY > optimize the implementation to provide an Application Programming > Interface (API) or kernel module to skip the IGMP-MLD Interworking > Function. Optimization considerations are out of scope of this > specification." > Why is this mentioned? Does that has to be normative? > > [Med] This is mentioned because the unicast DS-Lite architecture covers both Gateway-based and host-based architectures (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6333#appendix-B.2). The you quoted focuses on the considerations that need to be followed for the host-based model. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
- [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on… mohamed.boucadair